A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||
3 | ||||||||||||
4 | ||||||||||||
5 | Committee I - SDR, J, SA (Chair), AM | |||||||||||
6 | 08 May 2016 (Mon) 02:00 pm-03:45 pm, Bharti School Bldg IIA-106 (Class Room, Ground Floor) | |||||||||||
7 | S.No | Entry Number | Name | Supervisor(s) | Topic | Group | MT Sup | MT Com | ET Sup | ET Com | Total | Grade |
8 | 1 | 2016EET2630 | KRISHNA PRASANTH POTTI | J | Analysis of Healthcare Data | 0.00 | ||||||
9 | 2 | 2016EET2633 | ABHISHEK KUMAR TOMAR | J | Text Data Classification | 0.00 | ||||||
10 | 3 | 2016EET2634 | AKASH NAYAK | SA, AM | Medical Image Analysis and Segmentation for Liver Diseases | 0.00 | ||||||
11 | 4 | 2016EET2631 | BRIJESH MONDAL | SDR | Layout-based Document Matching and Retrieval | 0.00 | ||||||
12 | 5 | 2016EET2636 | MUHAMMED DAMSAS N | SDR | Vision-Guided Feedback for Robotic Manipulation | 0.00 | ||||||
13 | 6 | 2016EET2642 | SUMIT KUMAR | SDR | Fast Fingerprint Image Matching and Retrieval | 0.00 | ||||||
14 | 7 | 2014EE0453 | MANISH SINGH | MV(CSE) | 0.00 | |||||||
15 | ||||||||||||
16 | ||||||||||||
17 | Committee 2 – SSR (Chair), TKG, BL | |||||||||||
18 | 08 May 2016 (Mon) 02:00 pm-04:00 pm, Bharti School Bldg IIA-105 (Committee Room, Ground Floor) | |||||||||||
19 | S.No | Entry Number | Name | Supervisor(s) | Topic | Group | MT Sup | MT Com | ET Sup | ET Com | Total | Grade |
20 | 1 | 2016EET2635 | SWATI KUSHWAHA | TKG | 0.00 | |||||||
21 | 2 | 2016EET2870 | AMIT KUMAR MISHRA | TKG | 0.00 | |||||||
22 | 3 | 2016EET2647 | HEMANT GOYAL | TKG | 0.00 | |||||||
23 | 4 | 2016EET2639 | PRIYANK SONI | TKG | 0.00 | |||||||
24 | 5 | 2016EET2648 | JASPER LALBUATSAIH | TKG | 0.00 | |||||||
25 | 6 | 2015EET2693 | Rinku Takkar | BL | Thermal Video Stabilization | 0.00 | ||||||
26 | 7 | 2016EET2626 | PRANJALYA SINGH | BL | Clustering Online streaming Telecom Data | 0.00 | ||||||
27 | 8 | 2016EET2641 | KARAN KUMAR | BL | Improving Correspondence Matching for Odometry | 0.00 | ||||||
28 | ||||||||||||
29 | ||||||||||||
30 | MT: Mid-term, ET: End-term, Sup: Supervisor, Com: Committee, Rdr: Thesis Reader | |||||||||||
31 | Relative Percentages: | |||||||||||
32 | Project Part 1: MT Sup(10%), MT Com(5%), ET Sup(30%), ET Com(55%) | |||||||||||
33 | Project Part 2: MT Sup(10%), MT Com(10%), ET Sup(30%), ET Rdr(20%), ET Com(30%) | |||||||||||
34 | Grades: A, A-, B, B-, C, C-, D, E, X | |||||||||||
35 | Guideline for grades: | |||||||||||
36 | A = Exceptional original outstanding work | |||||||||||
37 | A- = Excellent original work but I have seen been better work | |||||||||||
38 | B = Very good work but lacking in either originality/scope/implementation | |||||||||||
39 | B- = Good work which can be improved with guidance | |||||||||||
40 | C = Fair work with scope for improvement | |||||||||||
41 | C- = Fair work with gaps in one or more areas | |||||||||||
42 | D = Unsatisfactory | |||||||||||
43 | E = Unsatisfactory, must be redone | |||||||||||
44 | X = Incomplete | |||||||||||
45 | ||||||||||||
46 | Report requirements: IITD thesis format. | |||||||||||
47 | Committee should have a copy at least 5 days before the evaluation | |||||||||||
48 | (1 copy: external thesis reader, 1 copy: internal examiner) | |||||||||||
49 | ||||||||||||
50 | Time: Mid-Term (15 min), End-term (15 min) [incl Q&A time] | |||||||||||
51 | ||||||||||||
52 | Mid-Term Evaluation criteria: | |||||||||||
53 | 1. Extent of Progress with reference to the updated work-plan | |||||||||||
54 | 2. Likelihood of meeting final objective | |||||||||||
55 | ||||||||||||
56 | End-Term Evaluation criteria: | |||||||||||
57 | 1. Final Accomplishments in terms of originality, creativity, completeness | |||||||||||
58 | 2. Significance of the achievement/contribution |