	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L
1
2
3
4
5	Committee I - SDR, J, SA (Chair), AM
6	08 May 2016 (Mon) 02:00 pm-03:45 pm, Bharti School Bldg IIA-106 (Class Room, Ground Floor)
7	S.No	Entry Number	Name	Supervisor(s)	Topic	Group	MT Sup	MT Com	ET Sup	ET Com	Total	Grade
8	1	2016EET2630	KRISHNA PRASANTH POTTI	J	Analysis of Healthcare Data						0.00
9	2	2016EET2633	ABHISHEK KUMAR TOMAR	J	Text Data Classification						0.00
10	3	2016EET2634	AKASH NAYAK	SA, AM	Medical Image Analysis and Segmentation for Liver Diseases						0.00
11	4	2016EET2631	BRIJESH MONDAL	SDR	Layout-based Document Matching and Retrieval						0.00
12	5	2016EET2636	MUHAMMED DAMSAS N	SDR	Vision-Guided Feedback for Robotic Manipulation						0.00
13	6	2016EET2642	SUMIT KUMAR	SDR	Fast Fingerprint Image Matching and Retrieval						0.00
14	7	2014EE0453	MANISH SINGH	MV(CSE)							0.00
15
16
17	Committee 2 – SSR (Chair), TKG, BL
18	08 May 2016 (Mon) 02:00 pm-04:00 pm, Bharti School Bldg IIA-105 (Committee Room, Ground Floor)
19	S.No	Entry Number	Name	Supervisor(s)	Topic	Group	MT Sup	MT Com	ET Sup	ET Com	Total	Grade
20	1	2016EET2635	SWATI KUSHWAHA	TKG							0.00
21	2	2016EET2870	AMIT KUMAR MISHRA	TKG							0.00
22	3	2016EET2647	HEMANT GOYAL	TKG							0.00
23	4	2016EET2639	PRIYANK SONI	TKG							0.00
24	5	2016EET2648	JASPER LALBUATSAIH	TKG							0.00
25	6	2015EET2693	Rinku Takkar	BL	Thermal Video Stabilization						0.00
26	7	2016EET2626	PRANJALYA SINGH	BL	Clustering Online streaming Telecom Data						0.00
27	8	2016EET2641	KARAN KUMAR	BL	Improving Correspondence Matching for Odometry						0.00
28
29
30	MT: Mid-term, ET: End-term, Sup: Supervisor, Com: Committee, Rdr: Thesis Reader
31	Relative Percentages:
32	Project Part 1: MT Sup(10%), MT Com(5%), ET Sup(30%), ET Com(55%)
33	Project Part 2: MT Sup(10%), MT Com(10%), ET Sup(30%), ET Rdr(20%), ET Com(30%)
34	Grades: A, A-, B, B-, C, C-, D, E, X
35	Guideline for grades:
36	A = Exceptional original outstanding work
37	A- = Excellent original work but I have seen been better work
38	B = Very good work but lacking in either originality/scope/implementation
39	B- = Good work which can be improved with guidance
40	C = Fair work with scope for improvement
41	C- = Fair work with gaps in one or more areas
42	D = Unsatisfactory
43	E = Unsatisfactory, must be redone
44	X = Incomplete
45
46	Report requirements: IITD thesis format.
47	Committee should have a copy at least 5 days before the evaluation
48	(1 copy: external thesis reader, 1 copy: internal examiner)
49
50	Time: Mid-Term (15 min), End-term (15 min) [incl Q&A time]
51
52	Mid-Term Evaluation criteria:
53	1. Extent of Progress with reference to the updated work-plan
54	2. Likelihood of meeting final objective
55
56	End-Term Evaluation criteria:
57	1. Final Accomplishments in terms of originality, creativity, completeness
58	2. Significance of the achievement/contribution